Well-respected sources and research often tell us that names carry much the same features as fashion trends. Miniskirts, for example, would have been entirely unacceptable in the Victorian Era. Likewise, just as the great Laura Wattenberg from babynamewizard.com discussed recently, Jack as a given name would have been considered most unwise, or at worse, an indication of insanity! And yet Jack has held on to the top spot of the UK top baby names for boys for the past 14 years, and doesn’t appear to be going anywhere!
So what is my point? Well, I have a query. If a name was extremely popular just fifty decades ago, what is it that makes it so inappropriate nowadays? Is it because most people view names like Linda or Leroy as dated? Most probably. I am, too, guilty of pigeon-holing names into an era, and pronouncing them off-limits because of it. But though you may look at that woman, over there, named Mary, and be unable to get past the image of an elderly woman, surely upon meeting a tiny one with the name you would alter your opinion? Perhaps, if we met more children with the names Deborah and Allen, we would be unable to claim it for one generation or another.
And so I came up with the idea to do a series of nine posts which would discuss six names from each of the past nine decades spanning from 1910 up until now, that are rarely used nowadays. The names would have to have been in the top one-hundred of their allotted decade and be near the tail-end, or preferably not in altogether, of the top one hundred for 2007. Unfortunately for any English (or other nationalitied) readers, I have chosen to use the American SSA List, simply because it provides more information.
So, beginning with 1910. The decade of handle bar moustaches, corsets and Penny Farthings (I think?).
- Beatrice This name sat firmly at 36 in 1910, and yet now it lingers in the bottom ranks of the top 1000 at 899. How could this lovely moniker be so neglected? Most reputable baby-naming sites will give you the meaning ‘voyager through life’ or something similar, which could appeal to parents looking for an elegant alternative to naming their beloved daughter Journey. But there is also ‘blessed’ or ‘fortunate’, which is equally as valid as a possible meaning, and could mean that this name is the perfect choice for parents looking for the modern equivalent of big-in-the-70s Joy. Though she isn’t altogether very popular here, some American parents looking for a ‘princess’ name but balking at the thought of a little Adrianna may take inspiration from the young Princess Beatrice, daughter of the Queen Elizabeth’s fourth and final son Edward. It is also a Shakesperean name, quite suitable for book worms and literature lovers like myself. I belief there may just be a comeback for Beatrice, popping uo here and there in more trendy regions before snowballing. That being said, I’d bet my bottom dollar it’ll never be a top ten favourite. As for me, I love Beatrice, but overall prefer the sassier Beatrix.
- Mary I simply could not mention her in the opening paragraph without picking up on her here. Just like swistle, I am a big advocate of the name Mary. I will grant you, she is in the top 100. But only the very dregs of it- the late nineties, to be precise. And really, how many babies do you know named Mary? Myself, none. Perhaps in the very Christian parts of America it is come across more often, but I couldn’t tell you as I’ve never been! Anyhow, I am of the opinion that Mary is a charming, neat appellation to bestow on any girly. I may be biased, as it is the name of my darling grandmother (actually, her full name is Gwendolyn Irene Mary, but she has never been anything but a Mary). As I touched on before, Mary carries deeply Christian associations, and many people may assume you are religious before they have even met you. That being said, it’s not a bad association. Mary is known as the Madonna, the virtuous virgin who brought the child of God into the World. And even Mary Magdalene, though she was a prostitute, became one of Jesus’ greatest companions and worshipers. If Mary is just too Christian, there are many websites which will give you alternatives- for a start, I just love Rosemary!
- Dorothy This just happens to be one of my sister’s favourites, and I believe it could be worn with ease in a playground full of Norahs and Amelias. Though Dorothy was riding high at number four in 1910, it does not appear anywhere near the top 100 now. In an age where people are discovering their babies can pull off the names Archie and Violet, I do not see why Dorothy should be any different. She comes complete with a cute pet name, Dotty, and an adult alternative, Fi. While the immediate association for most is Miss Gale, and Judy Garland as Miss Gale in particular, this may be a positive; think how adorable she’ll be in ruby slippers and a blue checked dress! Plus, it has a great meaning; Dorothy is the most popular Anglicized of Dorothea, meaning Gift from God. Whether you are religious or not, most parents will agree their child is, in fact, a gift (perhaps just for a day or two, at which point the Honeymoon period is terminally ended!). To take a phrase from Lola at her Onomastic Fits blog, Dorothy gets a thumbs-up from me!
Now boys, you may take it from here…
- Walter It’s like Marmite (I’m not sure whether non-Brits know what Marmite is, but oh well!). Some love it. Some loathe it. I, for one, love it. I think it has a handsome sound and while it sat comfortably at number 13 in 1910, it slipped in at just 378 in 2007. The Disney association is strong, but could be avoided if you refrained from using the nickname- or it could indeed be a plus for parents looking for a Disney-esque moniker but not really feeling Nemo or Pumba! There is another image it conjures up for me though, and doubtless many other Lost viewers; poor old Michael (that’s Harold Perrineau to non Lost fans) thrown off the raft, screaming WAAALT as his young son is whisked away by The Others. I get a lump in my throat just thinking of it. So, long story short, if you’re a hardcore Lostie, like I, but don’t fancy taking on Jack or Sawyer, this could be the one for you. Alternatively, for any particularly militant parents, Walter may appeal for it’s meaning- “Ruler of the Army”.
- Arthur Along with a Lily and a Freddie, my next door neighbours have an Arthur. And no, he is not nearing the end of his life. He is coming up to around five months old. And to be honest, I’ve been expecting it. I’m quite certain that old man/lady names are more popular here than they are in America, and a quick glance at the Telegraph birth announcements (which I first discovered on youcantcallitit, FYI) informs me I am right. What with Alfie doing a one-man race up the (UK) charts and names such as Harry and William in the top ten, people are peering further and further back into their family trees to discover ‘old-fart’ gems. And I thoroughly like Arthur. What with the association with the infamous King, and the meaning being stated as either ’bear’ or ‘rock’ on very reliable naming sites, could there be a stronger name than this one? Arthur held a very sturdy position at number seventeen back in, you guessed it, 1910, but by 2007 he had plummeted to just 374. Could it be time to resucitate him? I think so.
- Ralph Gosh, this was a hard decision. There were many a great name on the 1910 hit list, but a quick game of eeny meeny miney mo (do people play that outside of Britain?) narrowed it to this one fantastic appellation. I know many people think he has a silly sound. I can’t think why though; I believe Ralph is a fine name. And while it was rather unpopular in 2007 at just 869, it had a firm hold on the top 100 in 1910, coming in at 28. While there aren’t many obvious namesakes for this one; an NBA player here, a civil rights activist there, this could be a major plus for parents looking for a name with no expectations, no baggage, no “We named you after this great person, now go out and be great!”. And while perhaps it seems weaker or more effeminate than Arthur, it is actually derived from the Old Norse for wolf and thus just as macho. So in summary, a bold choice, perhaps, but one that, when you think about it, is rather rewarding.
So there we have it. And crikey, it was harder than I thought. I have a new-found respect for baby-name bloggers. Anyhow, I’d love to get feedback on this, if you were so kind?
P.S. I apologise if the picture happens to belong to you, but it was up on Google so I considered it fair game!